2. It's important to emphasize that what I was writing about wasn't something 
theoretical, but something that has already been happening for years at Hebrew 
Wikisource. We have been doing both critical editions and scholarly editing, 
have had much fruitful discussion and collaboration, and never even once has 
there ever been an edit war. Work on projects like these is indeed slower than 
the process of scanning and proofreading, but the final product is often a much 
more valuable contribution to the public. (The public domain scan was already 
available anyway. But where once a reliable edition was copyrighted and 
unavailable, now an even better edition is available online under a free 
license!)

I would suggested learning from our experience, and looking at your own 
Wikisource with a generous eye that values many different types of 
collaboration on texts towards building a useful free library for the public. 
While you and others are proofreading, be appreciative at the same time towards 
others who are editing in other ways.

Sound to me like a big mistake. Wikisource is a source, not an editor ; we have not to decide what is more valuable for the public. And soon or later there will be wars edit.

_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to