I don't agree that it should be fully automated by any stretch of the imagination. I can see that it is an option that some may wish to use, but I dislike the limitations, and do not see it working as the only means to use.
Regards, Billinghurst On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:52:12 +0200, Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:36 AM, David Cuenca <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Automatic creation of page transclusion is nice but also dangerous... too >> many structures to have an easy solution. > > > What Alex is thinking, if I understand his work correctly, is that when you > work on a new book in nsPage, > you "define" what the structure is (his work right now is wrapping > titles/chapters in {{title}} templates, to give the book a logic > structure), and then a bot runs, create corrispondent ns0 chapters and > transclude pages. > > I think that ns0 automation is something long needed, as we could suggest > users to focus just on nsPage and Indexes. All the difficult transclusion > part would be automatic (or semi-automatic). > > I wonder if there is a better way to define the logic structure of our > book, maybe directly in the Index page. > I don't know what would be easier for the user: > * define the table of content once for all in the Index page > * define the table of content once in the book Toc (there is often one, if > not always, when needed) > * define the table of content just putting templates thorough the book, as > the reader goes through the book. > > What do you all think? > > Aubrey _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
