Strange.... I entered and I saw them, both logged and unlogged; I only
found a default setting to hide them, but both using preferences or
Proofreading tools (Instrumentos de revisão) header and footer can be seen.

Alex


2013/12/14 Luiz Augusto <[email protected]>

> Header and footer sections aren't being displayed on pt.wikisource.
>
> Maybe it's due to local scripts?
>
> Example:
> https://pt.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=P%C3%A1gina:Phar%C3%B3es.pdf/45&action=edit
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:52 AM, billinghurst <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Gday Tpt,
>>
>> I would like to thank you for all the work that you have been doing to
>> firstly convert the ProofreaPage extension away from the javascript
>> methodology, into the new schema.  Then all the time that you have spent
>> bug fixing this past week. It probably sounds as though we are complaining
>> at times with raising issues, but to let you know personally that I think
>> that the work that you have been doing for the editing community, and then
>> for the reading community, is magnificent.
>>
>> So that big thank you to you, and to those who have helped problem solve
>> this past week. Really appreciated.
>>
>> Regards Billinghurst
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:34:09 +0100, Thomas Tanon <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Some improvements and bug corrections have been deployed some minutes
>> ago
>> > as part of MediaWiki 1.23wmf6:
>> >
>> > Here is a list of fixed issues:
>> > * A JavaScript fatal error in Page: pages editing interface is solved
>> for
>> > Internet Explorer 8 or less and old Safari versions.
>> > * Mediawiki:proofreadpage_default_header and
>> > Mediawiki:proofreadpage_default_footer and text layer extraction now
>> works
>> > for Page: pages without index.
>> > * It is possible again to zoom in on mouse scroll.
>> > * The level change summary tag is now added when you click on the level
>> > selector (it’s what was done before the new Page: pages editing
>> interface
>> > deployment)
>> >
>> > Here is the remaining known issues (thanks to report ones that haven’t
>> > been listed here):
>> > * Fatal error on submit for a very few pages (a correction is on review)
>> > * the issue with gadget that Aubrey have reported here (I think that the
>> > solution is more on the gadget side that on the extension one)
>> > * It isn't possible to edit only the body of a page throw the API
>> > * The body content editing area doesn’t fit the scan height in vertical
>> > editing mode. I’m looking for a clean way to fix this problem.
>> > * The tab order in Page: pages editing interface is strange. A
>> correction
>> > for it is ready and will be deployed soon.
>> >
>> > Thomas
>> >
>> > Le 6 déc. 2013 à 23:53, Alex Brollo <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> Thanks Thomas but.... I can't write php, just a little of python and
>> >> javascript.
>> >> But more or less I can read it (if statements are simple) , thanks for
>> >> link.
>> >>
>> >> Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/12/6 Thomas Tanon <[email protected]>
>> >> The trim final routine is done automatically by the Wikitext content
>> >> representation. So, it have been very easy to implement. If you are
>> >> interested, here is the internal representation of a Page: page:
>> >>
>>
>> https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki%2Fextensions%2FProofreadPage.git/8435e3855decbebc809280edffc9013b38b1f349/includes%2Fpage%2FProofreadPageContent.php
>> >> About automatic addition of the references tag, it’s a good idea. Feel
>> >> free to hack the extension (you are really invited to do so :-)) or to
>> >> fill a bug on bugzilla.
>> >> Thomas
>> >>
>> >> Le 6 déc. 2013 à 14:28, Alex Brollo <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >>>> Hi!
>> >>>> No, there isn’t any doc about it. The Proofread Page doc is very
>> messy
>> >>>> and work on documentation is something really needed (it’s something
>> >>>> that any advanced editor of Wikisource can do).
>> >>>> # yes the bottom of nsPage body is trimmed (it’s normal normalisation
>> >>>> of wikitext content). If it breaks pages we can disable this
>> >>>> normalisation.
>> >>>> # you can add a default footer content in Mediawiki:proofread
>> >>>> page_default_footer (it doesn’t works currently because of a bug but
>> it
>> >>>> should be fixed soon (in the worst case at next Tuesday deployment)).
>>
>> >>>> If you want to customize this value for a specific index, just add a
>> >>>> new field called 'Footer’ (the ID is important) in
>> >>>> MediaWiki:Proofreadpage_index_data_config with header:true.
>> >>>> en.wikisource use this feature.
>> >>>> # basically yes
>> >>>> # yes you have to if you use the action=edit API. I’m working on an
>> >>>> other API action that will allow to edit only the body and/or the
>> >>>> proofreading level (and that will be used also by the VisualEditor
>> when
>> >>>> it’ll be integrated)
>> >>>
>> >>>        by Thomas
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for details; usually we are learning by "try and learn" and
>> >>> explicit details like those you give save hours of tries!
>> >>>
>> >>> # trimming bottom of the page: IMHO it's an excellent idea. The simple
>> >>> trick to add (manually or by a script launched at onSubmit event) a
>> >>> tl|nop at the bottom of the page when needed to force the closure of a
>> >>> paragraph at the bottom of the page and saves many transclusion
>> issues.
>> >>> # in the meantime, since we have to activate such a "final cleanup
>> >>> routine", it would be easy to "take a look" to body text and to add a
>> >>> references tag (after a new line) into the footer only when needed
>> (t.i.
>> >>> when text contains a ref tag or a template building a ref tag - an
>> >>> infrequent case.
>> >>> # I only use wikipedia.Page .put() method to edit pages by bot, I
>> don't
>> >>> know if it uses API action=edit, but anyone writing by itself scripts
>> to
>> >>> edit nsPage is used to test carefully the header-body-footer stuff so
>> >>> that here some try-and-learn will clarify the matter.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm going to copy-and-paste your  message.... as soon as this
>> >>> unavoidable "bug explosion" will rest, I've many other questions for
>> >>> you.... but not now. :-)
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks again.
>> >>>
>> >>> Alex
>> >>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to