Ooops, didn't looked on my wikisource-l gmail label before fwding the
message. Sorry for duplicating the announce done by Aubrey
Em 30/01/2014 06:00, "Luiz Augusto" <[email protected]> escreveu:

> May be an interesting read for those of us that lives outside the USA and
> curates public domain contents.
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> De: "Yael Meron" <[email protected]>
> Data: 28/01/2014 06:52
> Assunto: [Wikimedia-l] A letter from WMIL to the Board of Trustees
> regarding the deletion of images from Commons under URAA
> Para: <[email protected]>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here is a letter I just sent on behalf of the Board of Wikimedia Israel to
> the WMF Board of Trustees, regarding the deletion of images from Commons
> under URAA.
> The letter is also posted on Meta:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Israel/Letter_to_the_BoT_regarding_URAA
>
> We would love to hear your thoughts on this, preferably in the discussion
> page on Meta.
>
> Regards,
>
> Yael Meron
> WMIL Board Member
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:36 AM
> Subject: A letter from WMIL regarding the deletion of images from Commons
> under URAA
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Dear Board of Trustees,
>
> As you might know, there was a discussion on Wikimedia Commons regarding
> the Golan v. Holder copyright case, where the copyright status of a massive
> amount of non-US images was changed from public domain to copyrighted. The
> conclusion of the discussion was that there was indeed a problem with such
> images, but that they would be deleted on a case-by-case basis. The actual
> effect is not only that masses of public domain images be deleted from
> Commons (with the burden of proof lying on the uploader), but also millions
> of PD images waiting to be uploaded to Commons which are now in limbo. This
> will certainly hinder or eliminate many GLAM partnerships around the world
> and, again, deprive Commons of millions of images, many of them
> historically important or iconic.
>
> The reason behind the community decision was that, since Commons' servers
> are located in the United States, all public domain images must
> specifically be in the public domain in the United States, regardless of
> their status in any other country. The Foundation's legal team issued a
> legal position, which did not actually take any position but gave the
> pertinent legal arguments. It is clear however that the community was in
> fact trying to legally protect the Wikimedia Foundation from lawsuits,
> therefore it stands to reason that the Foundation should specifically
> address where it stands on this issue.
> We believe that Wikimedia's position is not just to interpret the current
> legal status, but to act and change it.
>
> In light of this, we implore you to speak out and act in favor of uploading
> public domain images to Commons that are not necessarily PD in the United
> States, whether by allowing it directly, or making other arrangements to
> allow such uploads without risking legal backlash. Millions of images are
> at stake. This is possibly more than the amount of content that would be at
> risk had PIPA/SOPA passed, and the Foundation made its position on
> PIPA/SOPA very clear. It goes without saying that blocking access to public
> domain images on Commons goes against the stated aims of our movement and
> deals a severe blow to its legitimacy.
>
> This is a similar case to PIPA/SOPA, and the Foundation can and should do
> everything in its power to allow the use of these images in the Commons and
> making them available to the public. Clearly the community is starting to
> delete these images reluctantly, thinking it protects the legality of all
> Wikimedia projects, but this only has to be true if the Foundation stands
> on the sidelines. We believe that should the Foundation get involved, as
> with the PIPA/SOPA case, the matter will be resolved quickly.
>
> It should be noted that we the volunteers, both in Israel and in other
> countries, are doing the utmost to obtain official documents that make it
> clear that the relevant images are in the public domain. However, this can
> only be done for images owned by governments. For images owned by
> individuals the process is next to impossible, and is no different from the
> process of asking every individual to release copyright on any image. As we
> are frantically looking for all sorts of solutions, we expect the
> Foundation to act on the behalf of the entire community and by extension,
> the public.
>
> This brought our chapter, as well as other chapters, to rethink about the
> operation of Commons, and to seek alternatives. We may be forced, if this
> issue is not properly addressed by the Foundation, to consider moving the
> images to alternative servers located in other countries.
>
> Thank you in advance,
> --Wikimedia Israel Board
>
> ---------------------
> Yael Meron
> WMIL Board Member
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to