Really, simply to add "mul" to the list of included languages should be sufficient (in the double significance of "no specified language - multiple languages"). The "old" prefix would be perhaps better, since it's already in use into Iwpage transclusion. English could be linked to "mul" as default language for translation issues of interface. Is this so terribly difficult? Is there really a hard techno issue, or the whole matter is mainly a matter of "policy"? The latter case would be very disturbing.
Alex 2014-09-13 22:05 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com>: > Alex Brollo, 07/08/2014 15:33: > > Bug 62717 <https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62717> - Move > > oldwikisource on www.wikisource.org <http://www.wikisource.org> to > > mul.wikisource.org <http://mul.wikisource.org>, and I encourage any of > > you, reading these posts, to do the same. > > This bug title (mul vs. www) sounds rather silly. Focusing on a specific > solution rather than the goal you want to achieve is generally > considered a bad practice for bug reporters. > We have several OldWikisource issues related to the fact that MediaWiki > should recognise it as "mul" language and provide standard support for > such a case, but being forced to also change the subdomain seems > extremely weird. That said, if we manage to get some progress that way I > can only be happy. :-) > > Nemo > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
