"Wikisource"
+1 too!

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Andrea Zanni <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> "Wikisource" is a good name :-)
> +1.
>
> Aubrey
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Wiki Billinghurst <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> With the recent conversion of Bugzilla to Phabricator, I requested the
>> conversion[1] of our tracking bug to be a project[2], with the basic
>> premise that a [tag = project], and we are a community working across
>> multiple languages, and that some of our individual efforts spread
>> outside of Wikisource, and sometimes the outer efforts flow inside.
>>
>> Anyway part of the discussion comes to the point that we are not
>> unique among the sisters with that request/idea, and there is a
>> thought about nomenclature, for which the following post points to
>> that aspect.
>>
>> Being a person of simple thoughts, I would be happy for our project to
>> be called (wait for it) ... Wikisource, though that doesn't allow for
>> any future aspects, and others will have valuable input.  So I point
>> you to the general nomenclature discussion [3] and my specific request
>> [1] that is lacking a name in the request.
>>
>> Regards, Billinghurst
>> PS. Apologies for the noise for those who are already cc'd the
>> phabricator post.
>>
>> [1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78498
>> [2] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Help#Creating_a_project
>> [3] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78482
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Qgil <[email protected]>
>> Date: Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:35 PM
>> Subject: [Maniphest] [Changed CC] T78482: XXXX-Radar projects for
>> Wikimedia family projects and languages + MediaWiki Stakeholders
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> Qgil added subscribers: Rillke, Steinsplitter, Billinghurst, Praveenp.
>> Qgil added a comment.
>>
>> In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78482#846850, @Nemo_bis wrote:
>>
>> > I have no idea what "radar" means here.
>>
>>
>> A "Wiktionary" project in phabricator could also be a project used by
>> the Wiktionary community to organize their work. This is why I'm
>> proposing "-Radar" to identify tags used to collect tasks //on the
>> radar// of a community. Could be another word, or could be no word if
>> you think it's not needed.
>>
>> > Tags aren't inherently "more elegant" than tracking bugs. For instance,
>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T43492 used to be an on-wiki page,
>> which I converted to a tracking bug, which worked well because cc'ing
>> yourself is equivalent to watchlisting a page. Watching a project, instead,
>> brings you a ton of notifications for all tasks past and future: yes, there
>> side ways but they're not as easy.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > So, if the aim is to *replace* on-wiki lists, let's make this the
>> summary.
>>
>>
>> Fair point. A notification like "Send me an email when a task is
>> assigned to projects X, Y, Z" is possible with Herald
>> (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T630), and I expect most advanced
>> users to set one for themselves to fill the current gap of
>> notifications between joining (almost no notification) and watching
>> (all notifications) a project.
>>
>> In any case, you are right that the main change is to move on-wiki
>> lists of tasks to Phabricator. I have edited the description to make
>> this more clear.
>>
>> I think nowadays an own tag project is a better solution for a new
>> list, but tracking tasks also do the work, and they are indeed easier
>> to subscribe to. Maybe the difference is whether you want to organize
>> the tasks tracked in a workboard or not.
>>
>> > Then ask one by one what their requirements are for such a replacement.
>> Adding *additional* lists, instead, is out of question.
>>
>>
>> The maintainers of these lists are CCed here, please help if I have
>> missed someone.
>>
>> I guess you mean that i.e. it is out of question to create a
>> Commons-Radar project paralel to
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bugs still exists?
>> Absolutely. New lists could be started by communities that have none,
>> though.
>>
>>
>> TASK DETAIL
>>   https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78482
>>
>> REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
>>   Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or
>> !assign <username>.
>>
>> EMAIL PREFERENCES
>>   https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>>
>> To: Qgil
>> Cc: Aklapper, Qgil, Tpt, Micru, Ricordisamoa, Rdicerb, He7d3r, Carlb,
>> Quiddity, Krenair, Glaisher, Reedy, Nemo_bis, MZMcBride,
>> MarkAHershberger, Vriullop, Toniher, Arnaugir, GPHemsley, jayvdb,
>> Darkdadaah, Raymond, Gryllida, scfc, Krinkle, marcoil, Rillke,
>> Steinsplitter, Billinghurst, Praveenp, Jdforrester-WMF, Rfarrand,
>> Keegan, wikibugs-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to