First point is: is it a safe practice to validate a page without reviewing its raw code? A second point: is it a safe practice to validate a page without carefully reviewing its transclusion into ns0?
Alex 2015-08-10 10:48 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni <[email protected]>: > As you all probably do, > I sometimes go and proofread/validate pages in Wikisource. > The validation (going from a 75% to a 100% level) is probably the simplest > of Wikisource tasks, and it's especially fit to teach fist to WS beginners. > > When we do (in it.ws) the Proofreading contest, validated pages count in > thousands. > > The point is: > as of today, the procedure is pretty cumbersome. > It's easy to read one text on the right column, and on the left column. > What is not easy is to navigate through the pages: > * our indexes are not easily findable, nor understandable > * the arrows for navigating are small > * for validating or proofreading a page, I have to click on Edit, and then > proofread, click on the right radiobutton, then save. > > > I was wondering if some of your communities has tried to ease the > procedure, > and make life more easy (and *QUICK*) for beginners and experts alike. > > For me, I usually go to the Index Page, open in different tabs different > pages, then start reading. > But I'm sure we could come up with a different, easier procedure, when a > user *just reads, occasionaly edit and save the page as he progresses*. A > quicker, easier way to flip pages and reading. > > > Aubrey > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
