Yes, makes sense! Or a series of attributes like: proofread once? proofread twice? formatted? all images added? hyperlinked? transcluded? read in context with other pages? etc.
Only some of which need be linear. And only when all are done is the thing considered bonzer. :-) —sam On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, at 04:17 PM, Alex Brollo wrote: > I'd like to state a "binary page quality" splitting the workflow into > its basic steps (proofreading of text; formatting; adding links; > validating....), t.i. into a set of true/false states, clearly showing > the list of lacking steps. I.e. sometimes I fastly add complex > formatting to rough text, and this results into a exotic "level" > proofreading=false, formatting=true. It's a level 1, but it is deeply > different from a level 1 coming from proofreading=true, > formatting=false. > Obviously the whole "binary level" could be simply stored as a number, > with useful information into it. > Alex > > 2016-11-11 8:32 GMT+01:00 Sam Wilson <[email protected]>: >> __ >> That sounds really interesting! Do you mean as a way for people >> unfamiliar with Wikisource to easily contribute notes and >> corrections? On the face of things, it could perhaps work by storing >> the notes in a the Page_talk namspace and doing some clever thing to >> display them on the Page (and perhaps in main) namespaces. >> >> It seems like it'd be cool to be able to get "typo reports" or >> something, from people who mightn't have any idea of Wikisource other >> than that's where they got an epub. >> >> To rate a page, we currently have the various levels of proofreading >> quality. Is this not sufficient? And does the current Index page >> overview of all of a book's statuses work for you? I sometimes wonder >> if we need another rating, above 'validated', that indicates that a >> whole book has been read through and (hopefully) any remaining typos >> have been found. >> >> >> —sam >> >> >> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, at 12:27 AM, mathieu stumpf guntz wrote: >>> Hmm, at the conference I think someone was interested in a feature >>> to make comments on texts, like you can make on some word processors >>> for example. That may be interesting, but how you render the result >>> might be a huge user interface problem. One should be able to choose >>> whom comments should be visible… >>> Otherwise, I would still be happy to have more flexibable way to >>> "rate" a page. That is, a page might be text proof readed, but >>> laking some css, or a picture should be extracted etc. Having a way >>> to see that for all pages in the book: namespace would be fine. >>> ĝis baldaŭ >>> >>> Le 10/11/2016 à 06:09, Sam Wilson a écrit : >>>> Thanks Alex :) It's a minor project so far, but I reckon the work >>>> you've been doing on making a better, bigger, more proofreading- >>>> focused interface is really good. Do stick a proposal up! So far, >>>> we've got: * Add a 'clean' method for side-titles, and side notes >>>> to parser * A spelling- and typo-checking system for proofreading * >>>> Visual Editor menu refresh * upload text wizard * Language links in >>>> Wikisource for edition items in Wikidata * Display subpage name in >>>> category * Make Special:IndexPage transcludeable * Fix >>>> Extension:Cite to get rid of foibles If anyone's got half-formed >>>> ideas, I'd encourage you to post something, or just post to this >>>> mailing list, and we can all have a chat about it. :) —sam On >>>> Wed, 9 Nov 2016, at 04:50 PM, Alex Brollo wrote: >>>> >>>>> I too could add *some* proposals.... but the first one could be a >>>>> deep revision of nsPage edit interface to got the goal "fixed >>>>> tools, almost full screen scrolling text & image". In the >>>>> meantime, I'm go on testing FullScreenEditing.js by Sam, that >>>>> presently is an excellent, running step approximating such a >>>>> goal. Alex 2016-11-09 1:03 GMT+01:00 Sam Wilson >>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> __ Huzza for Wikisource; we've currently got more proposals than >>>>>> any of the other categories (not that it's a competition, but >>>>>> still...). @Micru: this whole topic of how to represent >>>>>> bibliographic data in WD and properly link it in Wikisource is >>>>>> great! I'm looking forward to helping. :-) —sam On Tue, 8 >>>>>> Nov 2016, at 10:08 PM, David Cuenca Tudela wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Thomas, thanks for bringing that up! I wrote a proposal to >>>>>>> finish the work retrieving the language links from several >>>>>>> editions and represent them in wikisource as language links. To >>>>>>> write or vote exiting Wikisource proposals, the link is: >>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Categories/Wikisource >>>>>>> Cheers, Micru On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas PT >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello everyone, The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team >>>>>>>> has launched a new "Community Wishlist Survey". Last year >>>>>>>> survey allowed us to get WMF staff time to work on using Google >>>>>>>> OCR in Wikisource that allowed some Indian languages >>>>>>>> Wikisources to raise and on VisualEditor support. Please, take >>>>>>>> time to submit new wishes and comment them. It could be simple >>>>>>>> things (e.g. a new gadget for a specific workflow) or very >>>>>>>> complicated ones (e.g. native TEI support). Cheers, Thomas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Début du message réexpédié : *De: *Johan Jönsson >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> *Objet: **[Wikitech-ambassadors] Your >>>>>>>>> help needed: Community Wishlist Survey 2016* *Date: *7 >>>>>>>>> novembre 2016 à 20:26:21 UTC+1 *À: *Wikitech Ambassadors <wikitech- >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> *Répondre à: *Coordination of >>>>>>>>> technology deployments across languages/projects <wikitech- >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> Hi everyone, Last year, the >>>>>>>>> Community Tech team did a survey for a community wishlist to >>>>>>>>> decide what we shoudl be working on throughout the year. Since >>>>>>>>> it's useful to have a list of tasks from the Wikimedia >>>>>>>>> communities, it's also been used by other developers, >>>>>>>>> >>>> been the focus of Wikimedia hackathons and so on. In short, I >>>> think it matters. >>>> >>>>>>>>> Now we're doing the process again. >>>>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Community_Wishlist_Survey >>>>>>>>> If you'd feel like spreading this in your communities, it >>>>>>>>> would be much appreciated. *) This is when you can suggest >>>>>>>>> things. This phase will last from 7 November to 20 November. >>>>>>>>> *) Editors who are not comfortable writing in English can >>>>>>>>> write proposals in their language. *) Voting will take place >>>>>>>>> 28 November to 12 December. Thanks, //Johan Jönsson -- >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ Wikitech- >>>>>>>>> ambassadors mailing list Wikitech- >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l >>>>>>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Etiamsi omnes, ego non >>>>>>> _________________________________________________ Wikisource-l >>>>>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l >>>>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>>>> >>>>> _________________________________________________ Wikisource-l >>>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l >>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > _________________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
