I wonder if, rather than creating a new IA item, we should just link the original IA item to the DjVu on Commons (via a review)? Or is there a discoverability benefit to be had by having the DjVu also on IA?
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, at 07:07 AM, Sam Wilson wrote: > Good idea. I guess it's not ideal to end up with two items, but at > least the 2nd will be updateable from our end. > > It looks like we can add HTML links to IA reviews too, which is nice: > https://archive.org/details/spinoza_etica_paravia > > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, at 11:52 PM, Alex Brollo wrote: >> Done :-) >> >> Alex >> >> 2017-01-02 16:49 GMT+01:00 Alex Brollo <[email protected]>: >>> Please take a look to >>> https://archive.org/details/spinoza_etica_paravia_djvu, this is >>> precisely a djvu-only item that I uploaded some days ago. I asked >>> for permission to create "djvu-only items" into IA forum and I got >>> it; this is the fiirst item I created; as you see there's some >>> "implicit convention" too (the name of item is the original one + a >>> _djvu suffix: it has been derived from >>> https://archive.org/details/spinoza_etica_paravia) and metadata are >>> the same, but a standard warning "Derived from files into >>> L'Etica[1]" into the description field. >>> >>> So far I did not do the last step, t.i. adding a "backlink" from >>> original item to the derived one. >>> >>> internetarchive.py allows to automatize the whole work (to download >>> metadata of source item, to build the new item name and to add the >>> warning do description field and to upload the new item). >>> >>> > > _________________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l Links: 1. https://archive.org/details/spinoza_etica_paravia
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
