They do all use the same API key, yes. There doesn't seem to be anything obvious on the API end. Request numbers are pretty low under 1 request/minute and our quota is 600 r/m.
The tool seems to be working: https://tools.wmflabs.org/ws-google-ocr/index.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fb%2Fbf%2FNandeesha_a.jpg%2F425px-Nandeesha_a.jpg&lang=bn https://tools.wmflabs.org/ws-google-ocr/index.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fa%2Fa2%2F07174-Mei%25C3%259Fen-1906-Baarmanns_Bierk%25C3%25BChler-Br%25C3%25BCck_%2526_Sohn_Kunstverlag.jpg%2F394px-07174-Mei%25C3%259Fen-1906-Baarmanns_Bierk%25C3%25BChler-Br%25C3%25BCck_%2526_Sohn_Kunstverlag.jpg&lang= Maybe it's a problem with the gadget? On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, at 4:11 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Just to eliminate a potential silly cause: do all those languages use > the same API key, and are you able to verify what's the quota usage? > > Federico > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
