Hello all,

I have put the question in the general talk page at nl-wiki:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kroeg#Feedback_van_lokale_gemeenschap_gevraagd

Several reactions came on that:
* users experience Bugzilla as unfriendly, and rather use w wiki page for bugs.
* other users do not know where to put their questions and problems.

* users want technicians be more visible and better reachable.

* one user had been searching for a technician to help for a year long and 
couldn't find one.

I try to fullfill my role as ambassador between tech and local users of Dutch 
projects. I do have a bit more feeling with Bugzilla, and what I try is to 
translate bugs to Bugzilla. On the Dutch Wikipedia we have a technical 
discussion room ( https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SHEIC ), we will 
transform that page to one where people can add their bugs and problems. In 
this way we hope to help users better to solve problems/bugs directly (often 
personal preferences, already known bugs, error in template or just the outlook 
of a page messed up by inserted code, etc). 

I think a lot of the communication can and should be picked up by local users 
with enough technical knowledge and experience to help in that local language.

Greetings - Romaine



> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:03:52 +0100
> From: Guillaume Paumier <[email protected]>
> To: "Coordination of technology deployments across
> languages/projects"
>     <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Wikitech-ambassadors] Local discussions about how
> to improve
>     communication between users and
> developers
> Message-ID:
>     <CAHLKNV2TjuwnryCqODj2oYRE6nX2H+4R+=1su2dxmxzydhd...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Summary: I'm trying to get comments and ideas on how to
> improve
> communication between developers and Wikimedia editors, and
> I'd like
> to ask the help of people on this list to ask your local
> communities
> what they think, and post the results of those discussions
> here.
> 
> Longer version:
> 
> Communication between Wikimedia contributors and "tech
> people"
> (primarily MediaWiki developers, but also designers and
> other
> engineers) hasn't always been ideal. In recent years,
> Wikimedia
> employees have made efforts to become more transparent, but
> what I'd
> like to discuss today is how we can better engage in true
> collaboration and 2-way discussion, not just reports and
> announcements. It's easy to post a link to a new feature
> that's
> already been implemented, and tell users "Please provide
> feedback!".
> It's much more difficult to truly collaborate every step of
> the way,
> from the early planning to deployment.
> 
> Some "big" tech projects sponsored by the Wikimedia
> Foundation are
> lucky enough to have a Community Liaison who can spend a lot
> of time
> discussing with editors, basically incarnating this 2-way
> communication channel between users and engineering staff.
> But one
> person can only do so much: they have to focus on a handful
> of
> features, and primarily discusses with the English
> Wikipedia
> community. We want to be able to do this for dozens of
> engineering
> projects with hundreds of wikis, in many languages, and
> truly
> collaborate to build new features together. Hiring hundreds
> of
> Community Liaisons isn't really a viable option.
> 
> There are probably things in the way we do tech stuff (e.g.
> new
> software features and deployments) that drive editors
> insane. You
> probably have lots of ideas about what the ideal situation
> should be,
> and how to get there: What can the developer community
> (staff and
> volunteers) do to get there? (in the short term, medium
> term, long
> term?) What can users do to get there?
> 
> Instead of just postulating that "The problem is X" and "The
> solution
> is obviously Y", I've started an extensive consultation
> process to
> learn from users, to hear you, to listen to your complaints
> and your
> ideas on how to fix the issues. I'm hoping that this open
> and
> collaborative thinking process will yield better results
> than a
> one-sided analysis.
> 
> An preliminary consultation took place last month with
> projects in
> English and French. I've summarized the initial findings
> and
> proposals:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_communications/Fall_2012_consultation#Phase_2:_Summary_and_wider_outreach
> 
> I'm hoping that we can now expand this consultation to more
> projects
> and more languages, with your help. It isn't feasible for me
> to launch
> a discussion on each wiki in each language, but I'm hoping
> that you
> can help me spread this message and start those discussions
> with your
> local communities.
> 
> I realize this will take some of your time, but I think it's
> worth
> spending a little time to discuss this now in order to make
> big
> improvements later on how we communicate with each other.
> 
> I'm available to answer comments, concerns and questions.
> 
> Many thanks for your help!
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume Paumier
> Technical Communications Manager ? Wikimedia Foundation
> https://donate.wikimedia.org


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors

Reply via email to