Is there any update on this for the wider world?  If successful, is there
a timetable for broader implementation?

thanks.
Regards billinghurst

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, Nikolas Everett
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Today we threw the big lever and turned on our new search backend at
> mediawiki.org.  It isn't the default yet but it is just about ready for
you
> to try.  Here is what is we think we've improved:
> 1.  Templates are now expanded during search so:
> 1a.  You can search for text included in templates
> 1b.  You can search for categories included in templates
> 2.  The search engine is updated very quickly after articles change.
> 3.  A few funky things around intitle and incategory:
> 3a.  You can combine them with a regular query (incategory:kings
peaceful)
> 3b.  You can use prefix searches with them (incategory:norma*)
> 3c.  You can use them everywhere in the query (roger incategory:normans)
> 
> What we think we've made worse and we're working on fixing:
> 1.  Because we're expanding templates some things that probably
shouldn't
> be searched are being searched.  We've fixed a few of these issues but I
> wouldn't be surprised if more come up.  We opened Bug 53426 regarding
audio
> tags.
> 2.  The relative weighting of matches is going to be different.  We're
> still fine tuning this and we'd appreciate any anecdotes describing
search
> results that seem out of order.
> 3.  We don't currently index headings beyond the article title in any
> special way.  We'll be fixing that soon. (Bug 53481)
> 4.  Searching for file names or clusters of punctuation characters
doesn't
> work as well as it used to.  It still works reasonably well if you
surround
> your query in quotes but it isn't as good as it was.  (Bugs 53013 and
> 52948)
> 5.  "Did you mean" suggestions currently aren't highlighted at all and
> sometimes we'll suggest things that aren't actually better. (Bugs 52286
and
> 52860)
> 6.  incategory:"category with spaces" isn't working. (Bug 53415)
> 
> What we've changed that you probably don't care about:
> 1.  Updating search in bulk is much more slow then before.  This is the
> cost of expanding templates.
> 2.  Search is now backed by a horizontally scalable search backend that
is
> being actively developed (Elasticsearch) so we're in a much better place
to
> expand on the new solution as time goes on.
> 
> Neat stuff if you run your own MediaWiki:
> CirrusSearch is much easier to install than our current search
> infrastructure.
> 
> So what will you notice?  Nothing!  That is because while the new search
> backend (CirrusSearch) is indexing we've left the current search
> infrastructure as the default while we work on our list of bugs.  You
can
> see the results from CirrusSearch by performing your search as normal
and
> adding "&srbackend=CirrusSearch" to the url parameters.
> 
> If you notice any problems with CirrusSearch please file bugs directly
for
> it:
>
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&component=CirrusSearch
> 
> Nik Everett

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors

Reply via email to