On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:38 AM, R W <[email protected]> wrote:

> As I said, I doubt this is the appropriate list, but thanks for the
> reactions, I now have a better idea what is possible to do.
>

It is also possible to nominate Beta Wikiversity for closure, a suggestion
I would gladly endorse:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects

Ryan Kaldari


Thanks!
>
> Romaine
>
>
> 2014-06-23 7:57 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>:
>
> I don't see anything urgent here. The pages in question are 2/3 of the
>> domain and there are active sysops: if you're in a hurry, you'd better
>> start a discussion locally now rather than later, your last discussion edit
>> was in 2009.
>> When local attempts fail, historically those who believe the subdomain is
>> currently inhabitable have several options:
>> * live and let live: simply ask hospitality on incubator or nl.books,
>> non-standard but equally valid homes;
>> * community awakening: propose action at the local village pump and ask
>> the nl.wiki community to join the discussion;
>> * nuclear option (not recommended): ask closure of the subdomain
>> (typically involves ForestFire across all village pumps, Wikimedia Forum,
>> mailing lists and RfC).
>> None of these involves wikitech-ambassadors.
>>
>> Nemo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors

Reply via email to