Note that while AbuseFilter correctly detected emoji in that change, the diff at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/75573 <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/75573> may not visibly show any emoji (depending on your browser).
At least in Chrome/Mac it doesn't show it because the diff change content is bolded. Filed as https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101219 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101219>. — Krinkle > On 24 May 2015, at 23:21, Nemo <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15 April 2015 at 13:54, Ricordisamoa <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/110 > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/110> seems to work. > > Nice. 610 hits so far, hardly a blockbuster. ;) Looks like unicode emojis are > making it easier to identify semi-random characters vandalism! E.g. > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/75573 > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/75573> > > Nemo > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
