If a B/C break is needed anyway, wouldn't this be a good chance to kill
that weird special behavior and just use {{#time:..format...}} for the
current date and {{#time:...format|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}}} for the last
revision's date like on all normal pages? Undiscoverable easter eggs like
this do not make wiki administration any easier.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Legoktm <legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> If your wiki has modified the "Citethispage-content" message, it may
> need some small modifications  to continue working properly.
>
> Background: The CiteThisPage special page shows different citations for
> wiki articles. It mentions two different times: the first being the time
> the specific revision of the article was edited, and the second being
> the current time.
>
> Special:CiteThisPage modified the parser so that any of the {{CURRENT*}}
> time magic words would use the revision timestamp, and anything wrapped
> inside of a special <citation>...</citation> tag would use the current
> timestamp. However there was a bug in this implementation where the
> {{#time:...}} parserfunction would always use the current timestamp,
> even if it was outside the <citation> tags.
>
> That bug has now been fixed[1], and will be deployed to all wikis
> starting on October 4th. To retain existing behavior, simply wrap any
> {{#time:..}} in <citation> tags. I know this might be a little
> confusing, so please let me know if this isn't clear.
>
> [1] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/311627/
>
> Thanks,
> -- Legoktm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
> Wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list
Wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors

Reply via email to