"Roan Kattouw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mark Clements (HappyDog) schreef:
>> It doesn't, and it isn't... :-(
>>
>> That said, the PHP_Compat PEAR module contains a PHP4 version of the
>> clone
>> function (providing you use clone($wgParser)) which I might try.
>>
>> Alternatively, is there any harm in just using $wgParser directly? Do we
>> have to make a copy?
> I don't know. The only thing I know is that you have to be careful when
> calling Parser members inside a parser hook, because the parser kind of
> goes crazy when code called from Parser::parse() calls Parser::parse()
> with different arguments; Parser::recursiveTagParse() is the function
> you need in that case. I don't know what harm could be caused by using
> $wgParser directly in other cases; I guess you could try.
>
I tried using clone() and it didn't work :-(
I think it might be because the tag that I am manually parsing for in order
to add its data to the DB is also used when rendering, therefore it is being
stripped out of the page by the parser before it comes back to me, which is
not what I want.
Perhaps it would be better if I explained the problem, as I think the issue
is perhaps a little more complex than I first thought.
Here is the tag I am using:
<data>
name=Jim
age=20
</data>
When displaying the page, the data tag has a hook attached, which replaces
the name/value pairs with a nice table.
When saving, or otherwise changing the page in anyway, the page is parsed to
extract the contents of the data tags, which are written to the DB for later
querying (via other means, not relevant to this discussion).
I don't do this on page view (in the <data> tag handler), as it is a
relatively expensive operation to clear out the old entries and reparse the
data tags, and the data will not have changed, so it is not necessary.
So instead I re-parse it whenever the data changes (save/undelete/etc.). In
order to parse it correctly I first need to run it through the pre-parser to
remove comments/nowiki blocks, to expand templates etc. otherwise the page
works differently to how it is rendered (e.g. data will be added to the DB
even though it is in a nowiki block). However, an issue arises when the
code is embedded in some other tag.
For example:
<somecustomtag>
<data>
name=Jim
age=20
</data>
</somecustomtag>
If somecustomtag parses it's contents then the data tag should be treated as
normal, and if the tag does something else which doesn't result in a parse
(e.g. syntax highlighting) then we should ignore this block.
Currently my code uses a new parser object, which doesn't have any hooks
defined so all tags are treated in the second way.
Changing it to use clone() as described above means all tags are treated in
the first way. This of course includes my own <data> handler, which results
in the tag being replaced by the output table, so if I use this method then
no data is found by the save parser at all!
Neither of these is the correct behaviour, as described in the previous
paragraph.
I hope I've done a decent job of describing the problem! Does anyone have a
suggestion that would allow me to do what I want?
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
