2008/12/4 Daniel Schwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> how things are categorized. As long as category intersections remain >> vaporware, there's no incentive to change. A technical fait accompli >> will bring about change.
> Uhm, yeah.. except that intersection of atomic categories are not vaporware. > We had proofs of concept for that and the interest was marginal. It's vaporware until it's usable as a tagging system in practice. > In any case. If someone would really just shoved it into mw core and enabled > it on all the wmf sites I'd be happy. I concur that it would make the job > convincing useres of a less retarded categorization scheme a bit easier. > As far as Aeriks soapboxing from a few emails back goes: Let's not kid > ourselves, tag based categorization is standard on commercial sites such as > stockphotography libraries. We are not exactly inventing this... This being precisely what Commons has been begging for for a while! > I'll shut up now, and I really hope that this is the last time we're having > this discussion... (but boy, you will get an earfull if it isn't ;-) ) The last time will be when there's a feature end-users can use without going off to the toolserver. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
