Please see https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16854
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:51 PM, John Vandenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > > This has probably been raised before (is there a bug for it?), but it > > appears to me that it would be significantly more user-friendly to > > append a <references/> section at the bottom of the text that is being > > parsed when it is missing. > > > > This would > > * make it easier for new users to discover referencing functionality > > (oldbies could still properly reformat the tag); > > * solve the "references missing in section preview" problem. > > There is a workaround that was originally here: > > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:ParaDox/VirtualReferences.js > > Which has now moved to: > > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:ParaDox/monobook/VirtualReferences.js > > It was copied to en.wp. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FT2/scripts/previewrefs.js > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
