It also completely screws up the redirected from line if you CTRL+Click on a number of redirects. ie: When trying to mass delete redirects tagged for deletion.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com] -Nadir-Point & Wiki-Tools (http://nadir-point.com) (http://wiki-tools.com) -MonkeyScript (http://monkeyscript.org) -Animepedia (http://anime.wikia.com) -Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com) -Soul Eater Wiki (http://souleater.wikia.com) Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Emil Podlaszewski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not all requests hit the backend if you have squid or varnish in front >> of your apaches. >> > > They do if you just set a cookie and the response has Vary: Cookie. > :) I didn't think about the interaction with Squid, but I don't think > it would be disastrous. It would have to cache an extra response: the > redirect itself (with the cookie-setting header), and then the target > page (with the cookie-unsetting header). Both of these would only be > cache hits if the requester's cookies matched the original requester's > cookies, so nothing incorrect should be served. > > It does add an extra HTTP request, and therefore an extra roundtrip, > so it would slow things down a bit regardless of caching, compared to > the current method. But that's true for all HTTP redirects. > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
