Oh... So $wgFlaggedRevsAutoReviewNew Override and ReviewForDefault setup FlaggedRevs so that it isn't applied to pages unless told to specifically, ok.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com] -Nadir-Point & Wiki-Tools (http://nadir-point.com) (http://wiki-tools.com) -MonkeyScript (http://monkeyscript.org) -Animepedia (http://anime.wikia.com) -Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com) -Soul Eater Wiki (http://souleater.wikia.com) Alex wrote: > Daniel Friesen wrote: > >> Are there any plans to tie FlaggedRevs in with the page protection system? >> >> I heard something about a feature for making it so that FlaggedRevs was >> only applied to specific pages (ie: Ones noted to have heavy >> traffic/vandalism) but it appears that the feature has something to do >> with whitelisting pages with a config variable, which isn't very good >> for my use case. >> >> >> The use case I'm thinking of is this. >> >> On the Narutopedia nearly every time a new volume comes out, we get >> piles of new users coming in trying to add unconfirmed information to >> the wiki, most of it false info and pure speculation. For that reason >> the community has now taken to the idea of temp protecting articles >> related to recent chapters every time a new volume comes out. >> >> Unfortunately this also causes comments on the talkpage of new users >> annoyed they cannot edit the page (despite notes that they are free to >> mention any improvements on the talkpage, and it only being temp >> protection). So I was considering an alternate option. >> >> I was thinking of something like FlaggedRevs, kind of like a protection >> level. Whenever we have issues with an article getting a lot of trash, >> rather than flat out protecting we go to the protection page and from a >> list of options [Flagged, Autoconfirmed, Protected] we chose flagged, >> meaning specific high-traffic pages likely to have false information put >> on them can be set so that all new revisions need to be reviewed before >> they show up in the stable page shown to the public up front. >> >> > > Yes, something very much like this was proposed on enwiki at > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection - its not > integrated into the protection form, but it provides an alternative to > protection using FlaggedRevs. There's a proposed configuration as well; > it may need some tweaks for your purposes. > > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
