2009/3/28 Tim Starling <[email protected]>: > The GPL restriction on linking with non-GPL code is irrelevant for a > non-compiled language, when all we're distributing is the source code. > I could find nothing in the GPL that contradicts this interpretation. > > Even for mixed-license projects written in C, it's legal to distribute > the source code, just not the compiled binaries.
I would say RMS would think otherwise. I guess http://clisp.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/clisp/clisp/doc/Why-CLISP-is-under-GPL is quite similar. -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
