On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, George Herbert <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that admins might not be necessarily trusted with permissions which > would screw up site operations. We do no administrator ID verification, and > the length and breadth of high load website operations/architecture > experience is not a selection criteria. Limiting it to people who > understand what effects it could have, and who are better known to the > community/foundation, seems sensible. > > Any reason not to set this up as a new userright we can have Arbcom hand to > admins on request/review/background verification?
Uh, what's you're point? Bureaucrats are not required to identify themselves and about half of them do not, cf.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Listusers/bureaucrat http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Identification_noticeboard I understand a couple of them are believed not to be legal adults either. —C.W. —C.W. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
