William Allen Simpson wrote: > Aryeh Gregor wrote: >> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4484 >> >> That should do what you want. > > Yes, this might be the equivalent of "{{<substonly>subst:</substonly>". > ... > Should <substonly> and <nosubst> become standard, we could use them. > > NB:I'd prefer <substituteonly> and <nosubstitute>, spelled out like > include. > And looking back at that RFE, which had a fairly simple patch, Brion decided "strongly inclined to WONTFIX this."
So, what do we have to do to change his mind? And, who would re-code the patch for the significantly revised parser? _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
