On 26/06/2009, at 3:32 PM, Brian wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Stephen Bain > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> In the good old days someone would have solved the same problem by >> mentioning in the template's documentation that the parameter should >> use full URLs. Both the template and instances of it would be >> readable. >> >> Template programmers are not going to create accessible templates >> because they have a programming mindset, and set out to solve >> problems in ways like Brian's code above. > > The good old days are long gone. If you believe there is never a > valid case > for basic programming constructs such as conditionals you should have > objected when ParserFunctions were first implemented.
The fact that we, at some stage, made the mistake of adding programming-like functions does not oblige us to complete the job. If we could make ParserFunctions go away, we would. ParserFunctions is there now, and there's too much code dependent on it to remove it right now. That analysis does not apply to StringFunctions. -- Andrew Garrett Contract Developer, Wikimedia Foundation [email protected] http://werdn.us _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
