Steve Bennett wrote: > For my own information, I tried secure, and made an edit. It wasn't > much slower than a normal non-secure edit (eg, 2 seconds). Or am I > missing something? What I do notice is IE spits up a "this page > contains nonsecure items" dialog on every single page... > I tried again circa 06:00 and had pretty good throughput until about 11:30 today (a US holiday), when it fell off a cliff again. My guess is severely overloaded in some fashion, or very sensitive to transient load elsewhere.
Yes, I had to turn off that warning in Firefox, too. Annoying. All the Wiki links need to come through the secure server! That means a re-write of every link. That would fix the current problem with doing inter-wiki work, as interwiki links also come up http instead of https. Obviously, links not to wikipedia/wikimedia should not be re-written, so the external links go directly. Is there anywhere that configuration and usage of secure is listed? I really think this is a superb idea, but.... _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
