Sure. I'll give it a try. It would be a good way to learn more about the code base.
--- On Thu, 7/16/09, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Brion Vibber <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] MW QA > To: "Wikimedia developers" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, July 16, 2009, 9:40 AM > dan nessett wrote: > > I understand. This was pointed out in a previous > thread (see "Is this > > the right list to ask questions about parserTests"). > > Dan, I certainly can say it'd be great to extend the parser > test suite > with a "known to fail" switch we can add to the tests which > are known to > fail. This would be helpful to folks trying to sort out > their changes > from longstanding minor issues without just losing the > information in > those tests [eg, that we know there are cases where we > produce bad tag > nesting, etc]. > > The test suite can definitely use some love; interested in > poking at it? > > -- brion > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
