On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Brion Vibber<[email protected]> wrote: > For reference, here's the rough current workflow: > > * items get filed into Bugzilla into site requests category > * generally a couple folks will peek at it, add the 'shell' keyword or > recategorize as appropriate, and add some clarifying comments helping to > flesh out the request w/ implementation details or making sure there's > consensus > * once or twice a week I try to do a quick pass through all the > still-open reqs; the ones that are ready to go I'll stick in Rob's > queue. Ones that aren't, I may put additional comments on them to ask > for clarification. > * Rob goes through his assigned queue intermittently between other things > > If there are questions about how it works or requests for more detail on > consensus, usually these responses are already put on there by the time > we reach it. > > Some reqs have slipped through the cracks, unfortunately, especially > older ones which haven't come up on scans of recent bugs. :(
It seems like it would help if there were some way for you/Rob to get a clear list of open issues that should be resolved soon (simple config changes). Currently it looks like some of those get lost in a sea of vague or hard-to-fulfill requests. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
