Hi all,

According to Wired, WikiTrust will be enabled on Wikipedia. Does  
anyone know anything about this?

It's also been picked up by TG Daily - http://www.tgdaily.com/content/ 
view/43812/140/ - which says it's already in place.

Mike

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Keith Old <[email protected]>
> Date: 31 August 2009 01:24:50 BDT
> To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]>
> Subject: [WikiEN-l] Wired: Wikipedia to Color Code Untrustworthy Text
> Reply-To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]>
>
> Folks,
>
> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/wikitrust/
>
> Wired reports:
>
>
> *"Starting this fall, you’ll have a new reason to trust the  
> information you
> find on Wikipedia: An optional feature called “WikiTrust” will  
> color code
> every word of the encyclopedia based on the reliability of its  
> author and
> the length of time it has persisted on the page.*
>
> *More than 60 million people visit the free, open-access  
> encyclopedia each
> month, searching for knowledge on 12 million pages in 260  
> languages. But
> despite its popularity,
> **Wikipedia*<http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/wikitrust/ 
> www.wikipedia.org>
> * has long suffered criticism from those who say it’s not reliable.  
> Because
> anyone with an internet connection can contribute, the site is  
> subject to
> vandalism, bias and misinformation. And edits are anonymous, so  
> there’s no
> easy way to separate credible information from fake content created by
> vandals.*
>
> *Now, researchers from the **Wiki Lab* <http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/ 
> >* at the
> University of California, Santa Cruz have created a system to help  
> users
> know when to trust Wikipedia—and when to reach for that dusty  
> Encyclopedia
> Britannica on the shelf. Called
> **WikiTrust*<http://wikitrust.soe.ucsc.edu/index.php/Main_Page>
> *, the program assigns a color code to newly edited text using an  
> algorithm
> that calculates author reputation from the lifespan of their past
> contributions. It’s based on a simple concept: The longer information
> persists on the page, the more accurate it’s likely to be.*
>
> *Text from questionable sources starts out with a bright orange  
> background,
> while text from trusted authors gets a lighter shade. As more  
> people view
> and edit the new text, it gradually gains more “trust” and turns  
> from orange
> to white."*
>
> More in story
>
> *Regards*
>
> **
>
> *Keith*
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to