"Tisza Gergo" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Chad <innocentkiller <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jan Luca<jan <at> jans-seite.de> wrote:
>> > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Version said that the version 
>> > of
>> > Commons is r55629.
>> >
>> > Now my question is why there is no Upload-API on Commons? The truck 
>> > hold the
>> > function at this revision.
>>
>> Because the WMF sites don't run trunk, they run the wmf-deployment
>> branch. The overall repository version number is r55780, but the WMF
>> sites are certainly not running that. Just waiting for code review to 
>> finish
>> and quite a lot of stuff will go live :)
>
> According to the SVN log, the live version is based on r52088 of the trunk 
> (with
> a few later changes merged in).

That brings up an interesting issue.  Now that the live WMF sites are based 
on the wmf-deployment branch, should the code that works out the SVN 
revision be reporting the version of trunk which it was based on, the 
revision of the last commit to the wmf-deployment branch, or the HEAD 
revision of the repository at the point the code was last scapped?

It is unclear from the above whether MW is currently reporting the second or 
third of these options, but the third definitely seems wrong to me.  The 
first (revision of trunk) would be most useful for what I expect is the most 
common use-case ("Has feature X made it into the live site?") but less 
useful for people wanting to replicate the WMF setup (i.e. "Which revision 
of the deployment branch is currently in use").  I am aware that the first 
option is more difficult (impossible?) to report, so perhaps that is not an 
option.  If that is the case then it could perhaps be made clearer by 
including the path on the page.  I am aware that the link goes to the right 
place, but it might be better to include it in the text, i.e. instead of 
displaying "(rXXX)" we could display "(checked out from 
http://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/mediawiki/branches/wmf-deployment/, rXXX)".

Just a thought - perhaps everything's fine as it is...

- Mark Clements (HappyDog) 



_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to