Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: > Hi! > Is there any progress on this? Or, that's closed topic and such built-in > language won't be implemented? > By the way, the lots of MediaWiki installations use TeX, so OCaml is > already available as the language for extensions. Imagine #ocaml parser > function or an ocaml tag. It's not the most lightweight choise, though. > Also, Bryan Tong Minh had a great idea - choosing between an external > (compiled) version of Lua (or another scripting language) and > "fallback" to slow built-in interpreter, when the first choice is > unavailable. Perhaps a limited subset of Lua.
That thread was just talk, I don't think anyone was interested enough to actually do anything. Nobody made any promises. -- Tim Starling _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
