Stefano Ronzoni wrote: > Hi. I'm considering mediawiki for a large scale application (more then 2000 > users). > > Main points of the application are: > > 1) there must be a herarchical users structure such as: > GOD > ANGEL1 > REVEREND1 > GOD > ANGEL1 > REVEREND2 > GOD > ANGEL2 > REVEREND3 > > REVERENDS can see and edit ONLY their personal contents. ANGELS can see and > edit ONLY their personal contents plus the contents of their subordinates > (for exemple: ANGEL1 can manage the contents of REVEREND1 and REVEREND2). > > 2) The structure of the point 1 changes very often. Also users data change > very often too. I cannot manage them manually from mediawiki webpages: it > costs too much time in costant manteinance. A server process must be > developed to daily import and update users data and permissions in background > from an excel, a csv or a webservice. > > Some exemples of changes are: > - a new REVEREND such as REVEREND4 appears under ANGEL2 > - REVEREND2 boss change from ANGEL1 to ANGEL2 > - ANGEL2 disappear > - REVEREND2 diasappear > - REVEREND3 became ANGEL4 > - all the herarchical structure totally change > > Only created and authorized users form the server process import can login to > the applcation. A user cannot register himeself because otherwise it isn't > possible to place him in the herarchical structure by default and to check if > he has got the correct system login nickname. > > 3) For point 1 and 2 I checked PermissionsACL extension but it seems this one > requires a lot of administrator manual mantainance. For exemple, have I got > to create a namespace for every one of my 2000 users? Have I got to update > every time LocalSetttings.php? Have I got to create a group for every user? > Have I got to write into Localsettings.php all the things a single user can > see on mediawiki because PermissionACL protects all? Is there a solution to > automate all of this from the server process of the point 2? > > Considering SQL Injection etc. etc, can PermissionsACL guarantee me a > proteceted application where a user can see only his own data in the > structure of the point 1. > > 4) In the structure of the point 1 is possible to redirect a REVEREND user > directly to his personal contents after the login? > > 5) And if I got to import, from excel csv or webservice, some user contents > to manage the fact in this way he is not forced to retype it?
Having GOD users allowed to change anything is easy. You could hack the code to have REVEREND1 allowed only to edit User:REVEREND1/ subpages. You could further change it to allow angels access to their reverends data. However, MediaWiki is not designed to be used this way. > 6) I've got a development machine and an application machine. When I create > on the development machine a release n.2, n.3 etc. etc. of my application: > how can I migrate it to the application server considering the fact, on the > application server, there are real data and on the development machine data > are obviously fake? Have I got to do it manually? What do you mean by 'releases'? If you modify MediaWiki code, you change the php files. MediaWiki content is stored on mysql. > 7) is there a way to backup only data or have I got to backup all my easyphp > folder to be sure I can restore the application? What have I got to backup to > be sure I can restore my mediawiki application? http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Backup > 8) considering more the 2000 users, passwords cannot be changed manually if a > user forget it. Too much manteinance. Is it possible to use Windows > Authentication? Or is there a way to enable the structure of the point 1 to > manage subordiante users passwords (for exemple ANGEL1 can reset the password > of the REVEREND1) ? MediaWiki default authentication allows the users to request a password reminder to an email. You can (and in this case should) manage the users using an authentication plugin, such as http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LDAP_Authentication > 9) if I've got to export data daily in background not manually (such as > REVERENDS contents) to some other system: is it possible to do it considering > data into mediawiki database are in mediawiki syntax? Depends on what you what to export. You want it exported on a different format? > 10) considering more then 1500 REVERENDS: they can write their personal stuff > in different ways. Is there a way to fix it in a common way so mediawiki can > manage links? The easiest would be a hierarchical structure where the author is embedded in the name. > 11) the idea is to develope the product in my language. It is not eneglish > because not all the users actually know english. Apart user imputed data, > will be possibile to update my mediawiki application in english one day or to > manage it multilanguage? Have I got to re-implement my application from the > beginning? MediaWiki has a really good localization support. Content can be on any language (it uses UTF-8). > Mediawiki is a good product but in my opinion is not the solution for my > needs because they are out of mediawiki contents and for what I can see using > mediawiki it costs me a lot in regular daily mantainance. > Please be honest, is mediawiki the right solution for me? Is there a solution > for my points using mediawiki? Or is it better if I look for some other > solution more customizable for what I have got to do and less expensive in > manteinace and development? I think it is you who should evaluate if a product is a solution adequate enough for your needs. A CMS might be more appropiate. OTOH, you're welcome to try to solve it with mediawiki. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
