Roan Kattouw wrote: > 2009/12/1 Marcus Buck <[email protected]>: > >> If there are performance problems with the conversion on serving or >> anything like that, of course storing the data in 5.0 is still good >> enough. >> > You're answering your own question here: converting the data once and > storing it in 5.0 so it's ready-to-serve is of course faster and > easier than juggling between 5.0 and 5.1 all the time. >
That was my first thought, but I notice in Praveen's link that chillu-k has no Unicode 5.0 representation. It's described as "not very common", so maybe this isn't a big deal, but is your thinking just to store (and transmit) the 5.1 code for chillu-k, while converting the rest to 5.0? Or is their some Malayalam typographical convention that is used now that we should honor instead? William _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
