On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:11:33 -0800, Tomasz Finc wrote:

> Steve Sanbeg wrote:
>> After the last batch of problems were fixed, enwiki was getting dumped
>> almost weekly.  But there was no dump in December, and since it seems to
>> be held up dumping the full history with an ETA of Jan 22nd, it seems
>> like it will be at least a few more weeks.
>>
>> So I wanted to check on what kind of schedule to expect.  Is this a
>> temporary issue, so we can go back to frequent dumps again once this is
>> done?  Or were the frequent dumps a temporary thing, and this is the
>> norm?
>> 
>> Would it be difficult to run the current version & full history
>> concurrently on a separate schedule, to allow the current versions to be
>> dumped more frequently?
> 
> Within the last year we've tried to schedule monthly releases at the very
> least. Most consumers are perfectly happy with that data set as the time
> required to go through the copy and process is long enough to where
> anything more recent is unnecessary.
> 
> Now with several fixes and the re compression of the text external storage
> we had gotten down to two week cycles for most if not all wikis.
> 
> That short release cycle was certainly attractive but not a hard
> requirement.
> 
> Since we've crept just over the month cycle I'm certainly tempted to run
>   another non full history snapshot in order to catch up. Assuming its
> not too resource intensive.
> 
> --tomasz

OK, thanks.  It would definitely be useful for me if we can keep two week
cycles most of the time, and not slip to more than a month.  I was
concerned that getting more frequent data was dependent on something else
failing for the dump to be created more frequently, which would be a
shame.  Anyway, I'll keep checking for the next dump.

Thanks
  -Steve




_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to