>  The point is,
> anyway, that enabling something like SMW (probably with fewer
> features) is orthogonal to RDFa/microdata/RDF support -- the extension
> could incidentally output RDF or whatnot, but it doesn't matter for
> internal use.

Perhaps the right approach for us would be to have "some" syntax for providing
this info, and then generating html5 microdata and/or rdfa into the rendered
html, write the triple into a smw backend store, and provide rdf/xml/n3/whatever
output via the api.

there are three aspects here: specify, store, output. perhaps we should look at
them separately.

-- daniel

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to