Roan Kattouw wrote: > 2010/3/10 Conrad Irwin: >> This should work the same way as extension parser-tests, with the tests >> in the extension's directory, included using a config variable. >> Otherwise, extensions are split over two places, so there's not such an >> easy way to just tarball them, and it's less clear from the SVN commit >> paths that all work was just to the extension, it also provides more >> flexibility if people want it. >> > On the other hand, we intend on setting up a server that runs these > tests automatically. Instead of having to pull these tests from a > million different places, it'd be nice if this server could just > update from one dir and be done with it, which is exactly why I set it > up the way I did. I agree that this is kind of the enemy of nice > bundling of tests with extensions, but I think having an automatic > test setup that tests stuff /before/ it's released is more important > and more frequently used than providing easy access to tests to those > .3% of downloaders that are actually gonna run them. > > Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
Shouldn't that server have the extensions checked out and installed on a local mediawiki before running them ? (I am assuming it's a single server testing against localhost) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
