Svip wrote:
> On 12 May 2010 13:33, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Alex Brollo wrote:
> 
>>> This question gives me the opportunity for a question to experts about
>>> server load. Is really so harder for the server to manage html tags like
>>> <b>, </b>, <i>,</i> instead of usual wiki markup ''', ''? The former have a
>>> great advantage since they are "well-formed tags" (even if they are
>>> "deprecated html tags"), while wiki markup is not at all; this would make
>>> much simpler to manage them by some bot scripts.
>>
>> You can use <b> and <i> in the wiki. In fact '' and ''' translate into
>> <b> and <i>.
> 
> Which reminds me, why doesn't it translates into <strong> and <em> or
> better yet, <span style="font-weight: bold"> and <span
> style="font-style: italic;"> ?
> 
> It could still accept <b> and <i>, but translate them into correct HTML tags.

Because not all '' wants to emphasize nor all ''' to make it strong.
Old mediawiki did use <strong> and <em> but it was changed for the above
reasons.
You could use <span style="font-weight: bold">, but what's the point of
that?
Using <b> and <i> where what you really want is to make it bold and
italic isn't deprecated.



_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to