"church.of.emacs.ml" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Hi,
>
>> There's another discussion happening at enwiki at the moment about the
>> stalled rollout of RevisionDelete for admins; which is backed up in the
>> chain of bugs which boils down to "our deletion mechanism is borked".
>
> Indeed. Basically, we have two deletion schemas in parallel at the
> moment, one of which is only half-complete, the other one sucks in many
> ways.
> I don't know if others share that view, but imho the long-term goal is
> to make RevisionDelete powerful enough to eventually replace the old
> deletion schema.
>
> See also:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21279#c7
>
>> Reviewing the whole deletion mechanism was on the topic list for the last
>> dev meetup, but AFAIK despite that event running for three times as long 
>> as
>> it was expected to, it never got raised?  I think this would be as good a
>> time as any to do so.  Do we have any clear idea or overall plan for page
>> and revision deletion, the archive table, a page_deleted field, a
>> deleted_page table, etc etc??
>
> I don't know why you think the meetup was three times as long as
> expected. Just because some devs were stuck in Berlin doesn't mean the
> conference magically continued on these days.

That *was* a joke... :-P

I think fundamentally this is an area where a solution which is 
super-efficient at *everything* is technically impossible, and we have 
various methods, implemented or proposed, which resolve some issues at the 
expense of others.  It's mainly a question of working out what we definitely 
need to achieve, and what we can afford to be expensive/slow actions (for 
instance, one out of reading deleted revisions, and *restoring* deleted 
revisions, pretty much has to be expensive).  Right now everyone who has 
ideas for *an* implementation isn't working on it because they don't know if 
it's *the* implementation we want.

--HM 



_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to