On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:39 PM, George Herbert
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Without having time to deep-dive the source code tonight -
>>
>> How difficult do developers feel that it would be to add the ability
>> to block an account or IP range and only remove the ability to create
>> accounts, not remove the ability to edit?
>>
>> We have the bit to block and block account creation (or not), and the
>> AO vs hard block bits, but this would presumably be a bit for block
>> but don't prevent edits...
>>
>> If the code already allows this, the UI currently doesn't, and that
>> would be a plus.  I don't recall what the code does, though.  If we'd
>> need to add support in the code to do this, I will look into that
>> more.
>>
>>
>> --
>> -george william herbert
>> [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
>
> It's not a trivial amount of work. What needs to be done here is
> breaking up blocks into a per-right system where individual rights
> can be removed from an account (or groups of rights, for ease
> of use). What does *NOT* need to happen is having additional
> columns tacked on for each right we see fit to block at a given
> time (account creation, upload, emailuser, were all done as hacks
> IMHO).
>
> I opened bug 14636 almost 2 years ago requesting this feature,
> but I haven't gotten around to doing it and nobody else has
> stepped up to the plate.
>
> -Chad

Oh good.  Well, in my copious spare time, I have an Enwiki user
annoying me enough that I think actually coding this up to work is
worthwhile rather than continuing to come back to 'em the hard way.
I'll start code diving when car repairs are done.


-- 
-george william herbert
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to