On 28 June 2010 12:19, Carl (CBM) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]> wrote: >> "Unaccept" seems suitably rare that I think we should consider a >> confirmation screen which shows the effect of unaccepting (i.e. a diff >> between the latest accepted revision and the penultimate accepted revision). >> Does that seem like a reasonable enough failsafe to keep this from being >> used unintentionally? This seems beneficial even in the case where the >> reviewer knew they were hitting "unaccept". > > I had the impression that "unaccept" does not add a new revision to > the page, it simply removes the db entry that the revision in question > was "accepted". Is that wrong?
That's correct, but from the point of view of someone only viewing accepted versions it will be like a revert. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
