Domas Mituzas wrote:
>> This is probably a bad thing. I'd think that most of the settings
>> that fragment the parser cache should be implementable in a
>> post-processing stage, which should be more than fast enough to run on
>> parser cache hits as well as misses. But we don't have such a thing.
>
> some of which can be even done with css/js, I guess.
> I'm all for simplifying whatever processing backend has to do :-)
>
> Domas
We have a couple of options: {$edit}{$printable} which do in fact the
same (remove the sections edit links), so they could be merged.
Additionally, the non-editsection version can be retrieved from the
editsectioned one with a preg_replace.
So yes, I think it can be simplified without even affecting the poor
CSSless users.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
