Aryeh Gregor wrote: > Look, this is just not a useful solution, period. It would be > extremely ineffective. If you extended the permitted staleness level > so much that it would be moderately effective, it would be useless, > because you'd be seeing hours- or days-old articles. On the other > hand, for a comparable amount of effort you could implement a solution > that actually is effective, like adding an extra postprocessing stage.
Yes, I have some ideas on how to improve it. > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:32 PM, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > Someone who sets their stub threshold to 357 is their own performance enemy. In fact, setting the stub threshold to anything disables the parser cache. You can only hit it when it is set to 0. Aryeh, can you do some statistics about the frequency of the different stub thresholds? Perhaps restricted to people which edited this year, to discard unused accounts. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
