Hi Mike, I think you may be hallucinating. We are just now hiring our second code-reviewer, who is also thinking about ways to make the code review process more transparent.
Danese On 8/12/10 4:49 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > >> Surely a few paid people can be assigned to make sure everything is >> reviewed, in place of some of their current coding duties. >> > Don't we already have staff for this? Hasn't "and finally get code > review and deployment up to pace" been part of several hiring > announcements over the past year or more? I appreciate that getting > people to the place where they can do good code review takes time, but > if that's what the problem is, then emails like this should immediately > be met with exactly that explanation. > > Or perhaps I hallucinated that the Foundation hired staff for this sort > of thing. > > - -Mike > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkxkiIoACgkQst0AR/DaKHvETACgvRrBgjXtlBC2iFcINm1QQecP > M6MAnRZEk2iq7PaMHnYV3KyWmF/4u6CS > =0EVt > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
