Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> writes: > >> My understanding is that PEAR has a specific coding style and set of >> standards, which is different than that of MediaWiki. > > Coding style is flexible, especially if we're the ones doing the > distribution. > > By this, I mean that “putting it in PEAR” could just mean setting up a > MediaWiki PEAR channel. PHPUnit, for example, moved > http://pear.php.net/package/PHPUnit to its own PEAR channel > http://pear.php.net/package/PHPUnit. Other packages related to PHPUnit > are also maintained there.
I think the second should be http://pear.phpunit.de/ > And as Rob pointed out, putting these “sharable artifacts” in a PEAR > channel doesn't mean that we can't continue to maintain them in SVN. > > Setting up pear.mediawiki.org seems like a good solution to me. > > Mark. That's an interesting idea. But I'm not sure if it would achieve the "make it discoverable" goal. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
