On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Maciej Jaros <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it still should be conscious decision and so those functions > could use their first... hm... second parameter as the transaction name. > For MS SQL you can simply use BEGIN TRANSACTION [name] (I think it would > be more natural), for MySQL I guess savepoints should be used.
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Are you suggesting some solution where commit() does not actually always commit the current transaction? If so, as I said, this is a problem because it will cause locks to be held for much too long in some cases. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
