On 17/10/10 13:34, Q wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/17/2010 5:40 AM, Robert Stojnic wrote: > >> I am sure google already taps into recent changes in wikipedia, but it >> might be worth contacting them officially to see if edits marked as >> vandalism can be threated with larger priority in their indexing process. >> >> Cheers, Robert >> > And what qualifies as vandalism and who gets to decide that? >
Good point, I think it also applies to the original blog post about marking pages to be refreshed. I guess the community will have to draft some kind of a proposal of what kind of edits can be marked for fast-track search engine refresh, probably in lines of what is thought of as obvious vandalism. Cheers, r. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
