Op 12 nov 2010, om 22:33 heeft Chad het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Max Semenik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Frankly, I don't like it. The current logo has the advantage of
>> looking *alive*. The new design looks plastic and dead, the sunflower
>> is less recognisable.
>>
>
> This.
>
> I'm not opposed to refreshing the logo if we can come up with
> some good alternatives (a community vote with several finalists
> like Trevor mentioned would be best). Give the choice between
> sticking with our current one or using this, I'd stick with the
> current logo.
>
> -Chad
>
Visually, I agree with you two. I like the current one the best as well.
However, technically speaking, I agree that having a version that is a
scalable
vector graphic does have advantages.
So how about keeping the current logo but trying to make a Vector
version
that looks as much as alike as possible (a little abstraction is
likely required,
but shades and gradients are possible in Vector too!).
Altough it looks like an automated pixel-to-vector conversion, the
idea is quite clear
in the following file:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MediaWiki.svg
--
Krinkle
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
