2010/12/4 Robert Leverington <[email protected]>: > It is unclear to me whether the plan is to branch from the latest > reviewed code or trunk HEAD This was kind of overlooked by everyone in that discussion :(
> , assuming the latter then I think that code > review needs to be a part of the schedule as it is by far the most time > consuming part of the process and presumably needs to be complete before > a deployment. Yes. > The schedule suggests an intial deployment in January, > but my understanding is that even if there were no further commits it > would still take until March for it to catch up with HEAD. > March has been mentioned by a few people now, and now you're even suggesting that /even with no further commits/ it would take that long. To me that seems overly pessimistic. The code review backlog in /trunk/phase3 was 775 revisions last time I checked (Saturday around 01:15 UTC). It shouldn't take 3 months to catch up with that. Of course "less than 3 months" doesn't necessarily mean it'll be a manageable amount of time, and there's WMF-deployed extensions to consider too. So I do think we should look at where the unreviewed revs are concentrated; if it turns out they're mostly recent, that'd be a strong case for moving the branch point into the past. Roan Kattouw (Catrope) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
