> I don't entirely understand the point of this. The plan seems to be """get > a large enough fraction of 'the internet' to make a change which breaks for > some people all at the same time, so that those people get angry with the > ISPs that haven't got off their arses to fix said breakage, rather than > angry with the broken sites""", which is fair enough. But AFAICT, the > breakage won't occur if your connection can't 'do' IPv6, but only if your > connection can't 'do' both IPv4 *and* IPv6 on the same site at the same > time. Surely that's not actually the problem that we need to solve if we're > to be able to migrate smoothly onto IPv6? When the IPv4 addresses run out, > we need to be able to start setting up websites which are *only* v6, surely? >
While the world transitions, some people won't have IPv6 at all, only IPv4. We need to support both for a while. And to answer the question of this thread, yes, we do hope to participate. Respectfully, Ryan Lane _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
