On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Platonides <[email protected]> wrote: > Magnus Manske wrote: >> On my usual test article [[Paris]], the slowest section ("History") >> parses in ~5 sec (Firefox 3.6.13, MacBook Pro). Chrome 10 takes 2 >> seconds. I believe these will already be acceptable to average users; >> optimisation should improve that further. >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus > > What about long tables?
Worst-case-scenario I could find: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_nuclides_(sorted_by_half-life)#Nuclides_with_no_experimentally_observed_decays 4.7 sec in Chrome 10 on my iMac. 6.2 sec in Firefox 4 beta 9. 10.7 sec in Firefox 3.6. Could be worse, I guess... _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
