Roan Kattouw wrote: > 2011/1/21 Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com>: >> Do we agree in the target db schema? >> That's the important point. >> > We haven't thought about it in detail. But it would be a fairly large > change and require changes throughout the software, as well as > possibly elsewhere in the schema. > >> Migrating a large site like commons is 'just' an operations issue. >> Making it readonly a bit wouldn't be a big issue, but could also for >> instance move to an intermediate point, where uploads are stored in both >> formats, while read only in the old one, while a script is moving >> records. Finally, flip the switch and drop the old tables. >> > Sure, it can be dealt with. It's just that it'd be an epic upgrade :) > > Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
We already have 1.17 branched, so... who dares to create a branch and begin with it? :) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
